I know that I do not want to become a teacher for me. It isn't about me at all; it's about the
kids. One thing that truly excites me is
the knowledge that by teaching I will still be learning. The world is not a static place but as adults
we can become static: not stepping out of our box, not broadening our horizons,
not trying new things.
Yesterday, I heard a statement from a parent of a middle
school student. The student's block
teacher said, "she is used to teaching the highly capable students and she
wouldn't teach down." Her new class
was not highly capable this year. How
did she mean this statement? I would
hope that she meant that she planned to challenge the students and have high
expectations for them, which would be great.
Or did she mean that she didn't care that this year's class was not labeled
highly capable. That is how she teaches
and she was not going to adjust her ways for this class of students? Unfortunately, based on the parents and the
students experiences this year it seems as if the latter was her meaning.
So I ask, is it about you, the teacher? Or is it about your students? Why would you not adjust your norm to give
the best to your students, at whatever level of learning they are experiencing?
All I can say for that teacher is that I hope she isn't
assigned a class of students who really need her help, the ones that may be
below standard. She would likely do more
harm than good.
No comments:
Post a Comment